U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Does the Mandate Make a Difference?: Reporting Decisions in Emotional Abuse

NCJ Number
213782
Journal
Child Abuse Review Volume: 15 Issue: 1 Dated: January/February 2006 Pages: 19-37
Author(s)
Russell A. Carleton
Date Published
January 2006
Length
19 pages
Annotation
In this study, 57 persons whose professions required them by law ("mandated") to report suspicions of child abuse and 94 persons who were not under such a requirement ("nonmandated") interpreted the seriousness of child emotional abuse depicted in 20 vignettes and indicated their willingness to report the actions to child protective services.
Abstract
Findings indicate that both mandated and nonmandated participants considered the seriousness of the incident the most important determinant in whether or not to report the incident to child protective services. They differed, however, on the secondary factors they used in the reporting decision. For mandated reporters, their willingness to engage in prosocial behavior (attitude toward helping others) was also a significant predictor of reporting tendencies. Among nonmandated reporters, being a male and having a positive view of the effectiveness and competency of child protective service (CPS) agencies were significant predictors of reporting tendency. Overall, mandated and nonmandated reporters did not differ statistically on the mean number of vignettes considered reportable. The finding that confidence in CPS agencies influenced the reporting tendencies of nonmandated participants suggests that a better liaison between CPS and professionals required to report suspected child abuse could improve their reporting. In addition to recording their perceptions of the severity of emotional abuse portrayed in the vignettes, participants were administered the Perceptions of Teasing Scale, which assesses concern with teasing as a form of verbal aggression; the Attitudes Toward Helping Others Scale, which measures willingness to engage in prosocial behavior; the Scale to Measure Conservatism of American Public Opinion, which measures general political viewpoints; and the "diffuse responsibility" subscale of the Ascription of Responsibility Questionnaire, which measures preference for diffuse responsibility in decisionmaking. 3 tables and 61 references