U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Differential Suspicion: Theory Specification and Gender Effects in the Traffic Stop Context

NCJ Number
214478
Journal
Justice Quarterly Volume: 23 Issue: 2 Dated: June 2006 Pages: 271-295
Author(s)
Michael R. Smith; Matthew Makarios; Geoffrey P. Alpert
Date Published
June 2006
Length
25 pages
Annotation
This study examined and tested the differential suspicion theory which suggests that police develop unconscious, cognitive schemas that make them more likely to be suspicious of population subgroups that they repeatedly encounter on the streets involving crime and violence.
Abstract
After utilizing 3 measures of suspicion taken from a large traffic stop dataset (n=66,000) in Miami-Dade County, FL, it was verified that police were significantly more suspicious of men than of women in traffic-stop encounters. Specifically, suspect gender was strongly correlated with the decision by officers to complete a field interview card or to request a record check of the driver or his vehicle. In addition, it was found that suspicion was strongly associated with the decision to arrest and that it had a modest, satisfying affect on gender and arrest. Overall, the theory of differential suspicion was supported. The theory of differential suspicion suggests that police may develop suspicion scripts based on repeated criminal contacts with particular subgroup populations. As a result, police are likely to be suspicious of groups who they repeatedly encounter in street-level situations involving crime. In an initial testing of the theory of differential suspicion, this study used gender as the principal variable of interest. References

Downloads

No download available

Availability