U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Review of FBI Latent Print Unit Processes and Recommendations to Improve Practices and Quality

NCJ Number
214619
Journal
Journal of Forensic Identification Volume: 56 Issue: 3 Dated: May/June 2006 Pages: 402-434
Author(s)
Melissa Anne Smrz; Steven G. Burmeister; Anja Einseln; Constance L. Fisher; Robert Fram; Robert B. Stacey; Catherine E. Theisen; Bruce Budowle
Date Published
May 2006
Length
33 pages
Annotation
This report presents the findings and recommendations made by internal review teams of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Latent Print Unit processes to improve current practices.
Abstract
The internal review teams generated many valuable recommendations for improving the quality and performance of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) latent print examinations with a few having a greater immediate impact. These are revisions in the patent print training program, revisions to evidence-acceptance policies, detailed revisions to "standard operating procedures" (SOPs) and casework documentation policies and procedures, revisions to SOPs regarding the decisionmaking process when determining the comparative value of a latent prints, and more stringent verification policies and procedures. Some of the recommendations included: (1) more detail and more comprehensive theoretical training on the basic biology of latent prints and the ACE-V methodology; (2) revision of the evidence-acceptance policies in order to address the limitations of the scientific discipline; (3) more detail needed within the SOP and casework documentation policies; (4) revision of casework examination procedures in order for decisions about latent prints of value be made during the analysis phase prior to the comparison phase; and (5) the incorporation of more stringent verification practices to include blind verification and more complete technical and administrative review practices, minimizing confirmation bias. The FBI Laboratory's review of its Latent Print Units (LPUs) and their practices was a healthy and beneficial process. The findings were adopted readily and quality practices were enhanced immediately. Due to quality assurance practices and the desire to improve its operations, the FBI Laboratory took the time to conduct a review of the FBI's Latent Print Unit processes. Eight internal latent print review teams were created. Appendix