skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 216414 Find in a Library
Title: Prison-Based Animal Programs: A National Survey
Journal: The Prison Journal  Volume:86  Issue:4  Dated:December 2006  Pages:407-430
Author(s): Gennifer Furst
Date Published: December 2006
Page Count: 24
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study explored the extent to which prison-based animal programs (PAPs) are administered in U.S. prisons.
Abstract: Survey results revealed that most States have PAPs and that most utilize a community service design that uses dogs. Participants are largely men and most programs were implemented after 2000. Survey respondents overwhelmingly had positive perceptions of the PAPs. The most commonly identified problem was reluctance on the part of prison staff to implement the PAPs. Despite the prevalence of PAPs in U.S. prisons, much of what is known about them is based on anecdotal evidence. There is a vital need for empirical investigation that includes long-term follow-up with participants. It is also important to consider how PAPs fit within society’s conception of justice. To assess the current nature of PAPs in the United States, researchers mailed a survey to the top administrator of all 50 States’ Department of Corrections. Surveys were completed and returned by 46 States; 4 States did not respond: Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, and Texas. The survey focused on program design and characteristics, such as number of participants, eligibility criteria, type of animals, amount of resources expenditure, and the nature of participant-animal interactions. Data were analyzed using both descriptive statistics and qualitative data analysis techniques. Future research could focus on how prison farms or livestock care programs are different from other types of PAPs. Tables, appendix, notes, references
Main Term(s): Inmate Programs; Prison farms
Index Term(s): Correctional facility surveys; Program design; Program evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.