skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 217839   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Integrated Approaches to Manage Multi-Case Families in the Justice System
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Nancy Thoennes
  Corporate Author: Ctr for Policy Research
United States of America
  Date Published: 11/2006
  Page Count: 155
  Annotation: This report evaluates the unified family courts (UFCs) approach in three jurisdictions--Maricopa County, AZ, Deschutes County, OR, and Jackson County, OR--that were developed to address the needs of families with multiple court cases.
  Abstract: Key research findings indicate that unified family courts (UFCs) may be more effective than traditional courts at delivering the critical court services of drug treatment, frequent monitoring, encouraging stipulations in dependency and criminal cases, and providing more services and encouraging reunifications in dependency cases. However, while the findings suggest that the UFC model can be an effective means of addressing the needs of families with multiple court cases, the UFC model requires substantial commitment from the justice system and is generally incompatible with the practice of frequent judge rotation across assignments. Significant court and job restructuring is often necessary to effectively implement a UFC system and judges within a UFC model must be willing to commit 2 or 3 years to the UFC system in order to see the resolution of their cases. Additionally, for UFCs to be effective, sufficient community services are essential. Thus, in jurisdictions that have the necessary resources and support, UFC models can be an effective means of meeting the requirements of families with multiple court cases. The primary data examined for this study were drawn from a review of the court records of families served by the UFC in each of the three sites. Data included the filings, hearings, court orders, and case outcomes for dependency, delinquency, domestic relations, civil protection, domestic violence, child abuse, and other criminal cases. The court records of 155 families in Maricopa County were reviewed along with the court records of 106 families in Deschutes County and the court records of 145 families in Jackson County. The total number of cases reviewed across all sites was 1,399 with 8,680 hearings. Interviews and focus groups were also conducted with program administrators and staff, judges, prosecutors, attorneys, probation officers, children protection workers, and representatives of relevant UFC advisory groups. Figures, tables, references, appendixes
  Main Term(s): Court management ; Court research
  Index Term(s): Family courts ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Oregon ; Arizona
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2003-LJ-CX-1008
  Sale Source: Ctr for Policy Research
1720 Emerson Street
Denver, CO 80218
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.