U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evaluation of Fire Scene Contamination by Using Positive-Pressure Ventilation Fans

NCJ Number
218773
Author(s)
Perry Michael Koussiafes
Date Published
October 2002
Length
5 pages
Annotation
This study examined whether a gasoline-powered positive-pressure ventilation system could contaminate a fire scene.
Abstract
The findings indicated that exhaust from a gasoline engine-powered positive-pressure ventilation fan was not sufficient to produce contamination at a fire scene. Specifically, the results revealed that towel samples from both trials 1 and 2 were negative for gasoline contamination. However, a trace amount of some of the early components of gasoline was found on the activated carbon strips analyzed from trial 2. It was noted, however, that the contamination that might occur from gasoline-powered engines was not significantly similar to what would be expected from gasoline recovered from an accelerated fire. Positive-pressure ventilation fans are designed to reduce smoke, gas, and heat in a burning structure and are generally considered from the perspective of the fire fighter, meaning the main factors under consideration are safety, fire contamination, exposure to hazardous materials, and search-and-rescue efforts. The research method involved, first, the preparation of samples of 100 percent cotton terry towels cut in 25-centimeter squares and activated carbon strips cut to 21 millimeters by 5 millimeters. Samples were then tacked to a wood strip. The positive-pressure ventilation fan was erected according to standard operating procedures, which resulted in the fan output blowing air into the doorway of the structure and the fan’s engine exhaust vented to the left. The positive-pressure fan was operated for 30 minutes and samples were collected from each sample location at three separate times: 0 minutes following fan shut-off, 1 hour following fan shut-off, and 2 hours following fan shut-off. In a second trial, the only difference was that 250 milliliters of gasoline was spilled on the side of the gas tank of the engine of the positive-pressure ventilation fan and on the ground. Towel samples and an exhaust sample were then collected and analyzed for contamination. Figures, references