U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Building Evidence on Best Practices Through Corrections-Academic Partnerships: Getting to Successful (and Efficient) Practice

NCJ Number
219227
Journal
Crime & Justice International Volume: 23 Issue: 98 Dated: May/June 2007 Pages: 13-21
Author(s)
Nancy Wolff Ph.D.; Douglas Gerardi Ph.D.
Date Published
June 2007
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This paper examines how corrections-academic partnerships can facilitate the growth of evidence-based practice, with attention to the conditions that foster and hinder these partnerships.
Abstract
A case study is used to explore these issues, drawing on the 5-year collaboration experience between an academic research center and a department of corrections. Over the past 5 years, the Center for Mental Health Services & Criminal Justice Research and the New Jersey Department of Corrections (NJDOC) have developed a partnership designed to create, adapt, and diffuse knowledge pertinent to practice related to how people with mental illness who contact the criminal justice system are engaged, treated, and affected by their interactions with criminal justice personnel and procedures. The conditions that favor the success of such a partnership must exist prior to the first contact between the potential partners. The leadership of the practice organization (NJDOC) must value research and the expertise of researchers as a critical element of planning, policy, and practice. Researchers, on the other hand, must appreciate that research topics, designs, and findings must be tailored to the interests and objectives of the practice agency. In the case of the Center, its mission was to study NJDOC practices and policies that influenced the welfare of people with mental illness within the criminal justice setting. The prison setting became a significant laboratory for the Center's research. Personal meetings between respective leaders of the Center and the NJDOC facilitated their willingness to trust each other. This paper discusses the details of the first direct experience between the partners as well as repeat experiences following a positive first experience. The dynamics of the partnership in the course of the growth of the evidence base produced by research are also discussed. 10 references