skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 220757     Find in a Library
Title: Just Say No to D.A.R.E.
Author(s): Dennis P. Rosenbaum
  Journal: Criminology & Public Policy  Volume:6  Issue:4  Dated:November 2007  Pages:815 to 824
Date Published: 11/2007
Page Count: 10
  Annotation: This paper reviews what is known about the effectiveness of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.), the most popular school-based drug education program in the Nation, the hot debate about D.A.R.E's evaluation evidence, and how this conflict between science and advocacy has been addressed.
Abstract: The paper begins with two evidence-based policy recommendations. First, because of consistent evidence from multiple studies that show the ineffectiveness of D.A.R.E in preventing or changing drug-abusing behaviors among youth exposed to it, it should be terminated or greatly reduced in favor of drug prevention programs proven effective by rigorous evaluations. Second, when conflicts emerge between evaluation researchers, program advocates, and other stakeholders in the drug-prevention field, the Federal Government must facilitate dialog among the parties in order to mediate the conflict and articulate standards of evidence of effectiveness required for continued program funding. In the early 1990s, D.A.R.E. America encouraged the U.S. Department of Justice to conduct a national assessment of D.A.R.E, confident that such an assessment would dispel growing criticism of the program's effectiveness, thus enabling it to capture a greater share of the school-based drug education market. This strategy backfired, however, when a national study by the Research Triangle Institute concluded that D.A.R.E. had not succeeded in preventing drug use among students exposed to it. This challenged the subjective positive feelings about the program held by parents, school officials, and the police, setting the stage for a lengthy public debate between the research community and D.A.R.E. supporters. Politicians continue to support D.A.R.E. and funding for it despite the negative research evidence regarding its cost effectiveness. 23 references
Main Term(s): Drug prevention programs
Index Term(s): Grants or contracts ; Political influences ; Funding guidelines ; Research uses in policymaking ; Juvenile drug use ; Drug abuse education ; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs
Publisher URL: 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.