U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evaluation of Pennsylvania's School-based Probation Program

NCJ Number
221286
Author(s)
Patricia Torbet; Ralph Ricci; Carol Brooks; Susan Zawacki
Date Published
September 2001
Length
139 pages
Annotation
This report evaluates school-based probation in Pennsylvania
Abstract
Results indicated that school administrators, school probation officers, and chiefs/supervisors regarded the program as an overall success, and particularly gave high marks to its positive impact on probationers and improved communication between the school and the probation department. The program provided school based probation officers increased contact with probationers, which promoted a rapport with youth on probation, resulting in more effective supervision. The outcomes were positive relationships, faster response times, and better offender accountability. School personnel believed that the program was effective on probationers, as well as on the general school population since absenteeism, suspensions, and school disciplinary referrals also decreased. By inserting probation officers into the middle and high school buildings where juvenile probationers spent the majority of the day, it not only fostered a closer and more informed supervision of probationers, but improved communication between the courts and schools, and appeared to have positive impact on the overall school climate by preventing delinquent behavior on the part of students who were at risk. However, as presently implemented, school-based probation programs have certain characteristic weaknesses, most of which are related to areas in which probation departments struggle to meet the Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission (JCJC) standards for such programs. In particular, the evaluators found that though there may be written agreements between courts and schools participating in school-based probation, there is still doubt and confusion regarding the appropriate responsibilities of juvenile probation officers working in schools, and fundamental variations in the way the school-based probation officers’ function as revealed; further leadership in standard-setting and enforcement is needed. Despite its limitations, school-based probation works well within the balanced and restorative justice framework and needs to be strengthened and expanded. The recommendations present a plan for assisting the JCJC and school-based probation programs in improving and expanding the program. Tables, references, appendix