skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221717 Find in a Library
Title: Assessing the Risk of Re-Offending for Juvenile Offenders Using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory
Journal: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation  Volume:45  Issue:3/4  Dated:2007  Pages:85-108
Author(s): Kristin Bechtel; Christopher T. Lowenkamp; Edward Latessa
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 24
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), an instrument that assesses, classifies, and assists agencies with developing treatment and service plans according to the offender’s criminogenic risk factors
Abstract: Results indicated the validity of the YLS/CMI in predicting recidivism for both settings. The study included both institutionalized and community-sentenced youth, thereby not limiting the scope to only one setting. As a predictive validity of the YLS/CMI on a sample of 4,482 Ohio youth who received either a community-based sentence (1,106) or an institutionally-based sentenced (3,376), multiple analyses revealed that the instrument demonstrated predictive validity for both groups and might be a stronger predictor for the community-sentences offenders than that of the institutionalized group. Moreover, the assessment was able to discriminate the adjusted risk level categorizations for the youth in both sentencing types. There appeared to be significant support for the capability of the YLS/CMI to properly classify youth by risk level and to predict the likelihood for future recidivating. The study included several strengths to address the previous limitations of former studies. The overall sample size was 4,482 and is the largest noted sample size in the reviewed research. Assessments on the YLS/CMI included the semistructured interviews and review of information in a youth’s file, rather than a retrospective scoring of the instrument with only a juvenile’s records. The followup period was relatively longer that past research, approximately 3.4 years. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed. Tables, notes, references
Main Term(s): Juvenile recidivism prediction; Juvenile rehabilitation; Juvenile sentencing; Ohio
Index Term(s): Corrections research; Descriptive analysis; Sentencing factors; Sentencing institutes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.