skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 222451     Find in a Library
  Title: Final Report on the Evaluation of the First Offender Prostitution Program: Report Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Michael Shively Ph.D. ; Sarah Kuck Jalbert ; Ryan Kling ; William Rhodes Ph.D. ; Peter Finn ; Chris Flygare ; Laura Tierney ; Dana Hunt Ph.D. ; David Squires ; Christina Dyous ; Kristin Wheeler
  Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2008
  Page Count: 17
  Annotation: This report presents results and recommendations of an evaluative study on the effectiveness, return on investment, and transferability of the First Offender Prostitution Program (FOPP) in California.
  Abstract: Findings from the evaluation include: (1) the First Offender Prostitution Program (FOPP) is well conceived and has been implemented as intended; (2) the program is effective in producing positive shifts in attitudes and gains in knowledge, as well as the program was found to have reduced recidivism; (3) the FOPP was found to cost little and to be highly cost-effective; and (4) the FOPP model is replicable, adaptable, and sustainable, and has served as a model for at least 25 subsequent programs. Key findings from the evaluation are presented in three areas: (1) evaluating the First Offender Prostitution Program’s (FOPP) design and implementation; (2) evaluating the FOPP’s effects on knowledge, attitudes, and rearrest rates; (3) assessment program costs; and (4) assessing program transferability. Recommendations are presented for the FOPP, the program itself, for technical assistance, and for additional research. Highlights of these key recommendations include: (1) conduct more Web-based reverse stings; (2) add some form of program aftercare or referrals for community services, (3) consider expanding beyond first-time offenders and pretrial diversion; (4) initiate an ongoing data collection program supporting FOPP performance monitoring and future evaluation; (5) creating a vehicle for diversified, practitioner-led technical assistance; and (6) creating an infrastructure for circulating information about sex trafficking demand reduction. Future studies are recommended to answer the following questions: why was the FOPP effective; is the FOPP more or less effective than other john school models; and what is known about john school programs abroad? The FOPP is designed to reduce the demand for commercial sex and human trafficking in San Francisco by educating men arrested for soliciting prostitutes about the negative consequences of prostitution. The evaluation results described in this report address three priority issues: the effectiveness, return on investment, and transferability of the FOPP. Map and graphs
  Main Term(s): Prostitution ; Program evaluation
  Index Term(s): Criminal Solicitation ; First time offenders ; Model programs ; NIJ grant-related documents ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2005-DD-BX-0037
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244350

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.