skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 223468   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: From Inception to Implementation: How SACPA has affected the Case Processing and Sentencing of Drug Offenders in One California County
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Christine Lynn Gardiner
Date Published: 2008
Page Count: 317
  Annotation: The goal of this research project was to determine how drug offender case processing and sentencing patterns changed as a result of California’s Proposition 36, Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (SACPA) and to examine how the criminal justice system responded to this legislation.
Abstract: The impact that Proposition 36 has had on offenders has been influenced by the adaptation methods chosen and employed by practitioners in criminal justice agencies throughout California. Findings reveal that street level bureaucrats at every stage of the criminal justice system found ways to circumvent and/or diminish the effect of this law, including, but not exclusive to law enforcement, attorneys, judges, and parole agents. These coping strategies were widespread, but not universal. They were deliberate reactions to a law that many dislike and most felt was being taken advantage of by drug offenders. Beyond the complaints, frustration, and fiscal constraints that inhibited proper treatment and supervision, Proposition 36 has had several positive benefits for the criminal justice system, as well as offenders which include: (1) improve legislative collaboration between criminal justice agencies and treatment providers; (2) provide substance abuse treatment for more than 24,000 offenders in Orange County (140,000 statewide); and (3) divert an estimated 3,400 offenders per year in Orange County from incarceration and other negative responses. It appears likely that Proposition 36 has had a net widening effect on drug arrests. On November 7, 2000, the State of California passed Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (SACPA). This law marked a significant change in California drug policy by mandating treatment in lieu of incarceration for nonviolent drug offenders. This study supported by the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) used a case study approach to understand how Proposition 36 changed the case processing and sentencing of drug offenders and the agencies tasked with processing and supervising these offenders in Orange County. The research illustrates how “law on the books” plays out as “law in action” every day. Tables, figures, references, and appendixes A-F
Main Term(s): Drug treatment
Index Term(s): Drug laws ; Drug treatment programs ; Legislation ; Involuntary treatment ; State laws ; Legislative impact ; Drug Policy ; NIJ grant-related documents ; California
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0031
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.