U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Why Are English Youths More Violent Than Swedish Youths?: A Comparative Study of the Role of Crime Propensity, Lifestyles and Their Interactions in Two Cities

NCJ Number
224102
Journal
European Journal of Criminology Volume: 5 Issue: 3 Dated: July 2008 Pages: 309-330
Author(s)
Per-Olof H. Wikstrom; Robert Svensson
Date Published
July 2008
Length
22 pages
Annotation
This article compares behavioral differences between youth in England and Sweden.
Abstract
The findings show that in both cities examined, young people's self-reported violent behavior was predicted by crime propensity and lifestyle, and their interaction; and a substantial proportion, 40 percent, of the difference in the level of violence vanished when taking into account national differences in young people's crime propensity and lifestyles. Most previous cross-national studies of crime and violence were said to have explored variations in levels of crime without empirically addressing the causes of these variations. This work drew upon the theoretical framework of the situational action theory of crime causation to explore and test whether the difference in levels of violence among young people in England and Sweden could be explained (fully or partly) by country differences in young people's crime propensities and lifestyles and their interaction. Additionally, the findings support the notion that one major cause of the difference in the level of violence among young people in England and Sweden is that more young people in England have a higher crime propensity and are living criminogenic lifestyles than in Sweden. The findings were derived by use of data from the English Peterborough Youth Study, which consisted of survey information from 1,957 students, and the Swedish Eskilstuna Youth Study, which contained survey information from 2 samples of 1,833 juveniles. Tables, references