skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 224115     Find in a Library
Title: Examining the Differential Impact of Drug Court Services by Court Type: Findings From Ohio
Author(s): Deborah K. Shaffer Ph.D. ; Shelley J. Listwan Ph.D. ; Edward J. Latessa Ph.D. ; Christopher T. Lowenkamp Ph.D.
  Journal: Drug Court Review  Volume:6  Issue:1  Dated:2008  Pages:33 to 66
Date Published: 2008
Page Count: 34
  Annotation: In an attempt to better understand the ability of the drug court model to achieve its objectives in a variety of circumstances; this study explored the characteristics and outcomes among seven adult and three juvenile drug courts across Ohio.
Abstract: The overall evaluation results are promising. The findings indicate that clients who receive drug court services, regardless of type of court, fare significantly better as a group than individuals who do not receive drug court services. Drug court clients were rearrested less than their respective comparison groups regardless of court type. Drug courts have played a significant role in the treatment of drug-abusing offenders over the last 15 years. The drug court model developed out of an organizational need for a community-based alternative to incarceration. Drug courts attempt to reduce substance abuse and recidivism through techniques such as monitoring, alternative sanctions, and treatment. Evaluations of drug courts around the country are encouraging; however, not all of the research shows a reduction in rearrest rates. This study attempted to add to the existing literature by providing a multisite impact study of both adult and juvenile drug courts in Ohio. The study examined the differences between drug court and comparison group members along a variety of measures. It assessed whether drug courts were effective in reducing recidivism and identified the factors associated with failure. Tables, figures and references
Main Term(s): Drug Courts
Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Program evaluation ; Drug treatment ; Alternatives to institutionalization ; Alternative court procedures ; Juvenile drug treatment ; Juvenile drug courts ; Ohio
Sponsoring Agency: Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services
United States of America
Grant Number: 00DGPEI7375;98DGPEI7375
Publisher URL: 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.