U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

What Use Insanity?

NCJ Number
224267
Journal
International Journal of Police Science & Management Volume: 10 Issue: 3 Dated: Autumn 2008 Pages: 280-288
Author(s)
Andy Bain; Megan Thomas
Date Published
2008
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This paper briefly looks to consider the use of punishment for those offenders suffering with a mental health issue and the particular difficulties inherent in a system that has little in the way of secure social provision.
Abstract
It seems evident that where questions arise regarding the appropriateness of punishment, it is never more important than when dealing with vulnerable offenders and those suffering some form of mental health difficulty. Under the Mental Health Act of 1983, it is suggested that the individual should be diverted from the criminal justice system as early into the proceedings as possible. However, there seems to be an issue with points as simple as definitions and in the use of key terms of reference within the Act which uses mental disorder and mental illness almost interchangeably, leaving room for professional discretion. This paper considers mental health as being a construction of the social cultures and the times in which it is defined, thereby impacting the use of punishment. The discussion makes use of a number of literary examples from the United Kingdom that has not used the death penalty since 1964, considers the situation in the United States, and discusses contemporary arguments for the use of capital punishment. References