Despite the considerable inquiry focused on the problem of sexual revictimization, researchers have not yet been able to explain why some survivors are vulnerable to repeated violent victimization and why other survivors seem to be resilient to further violence. Also, little is known about how to effectively prevent revictimization. Building from existing revictimization knowledge, this article identifies three priority areas for a revictimization research agenda and three cutting-edge statistical tools are highlighted and discussed in terms of their utility for advancing revictimization knowledge. The three priority areas that future revictimization efforts should address are (1) greater use of prospective and longitudinal research, (2) the investigation of revictimization resilience to better understand what factors help survivors avoid revictimization, and (3) the investigation of ecological contextual factors that shape survivors’ vulnerability and resilience. The three cutting-edge methods that can address the three revictimization research priority areas include: (1) growth models, (2) multilevel models, and (3) person-centered models. Sexual violence against women is a significant problem with serious consequences for women’s well-being. Because factors and processes that drive revictimization are still largely unknown, little evidence exists to inform revictimization prevention interventions. This article takes stock of what is known about revictimization and prioritizes next steps for research. References