skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 224988   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: HOPE II: Faith-Based and Community Organization Program Evaluation Study, Outcomes Evaluation Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Carrie Markovitz Ph.D. ; Lisa Magged M.A. ; Maribel Florez Ed.M. ; Suzanne Klein M.S.
  Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
  Date Published: 10/2008
  Page Count: 167
  Annotation: This report presents the methodology and findings from the outcomes evaluation for the HOPE II (Helping Outreach Programs To Expand) initiative, which provided financial and technical assistance to faith-based and community organizations that offered services to crime victims in urban, high-crime areas.
  Abstract: In its examination of the three major capacity areas specified in the HOPE II project request for proposals (RFPs)--volunteer development and management, community partnerships, and sustainable funding--the outcomes evaluation found that the subgrantees experienced the greatest improvements in capacity with respect to four aspects of organizational development. First, regarding volunteer development and management, the subgrantees hired and sustained volunteer coordinators. Second, regarding sustainable funding, subgrantees reported increased funding competitiveness and increases in revenue. Third, regarding organizational development, the subgrantees implemented electronic recordkeeping. Fourth, regarding service delivery capacity, subgrantees increased the number of services offered and clients served. There were only nominal changes in other capacity areas, including community partnerships. Based on these findings, the evaluation recommends more focus on improvement in specific areas of capacity. When the grant program focuses on specific areas of growth across all subgrantees, capacity changes are more likely to occur in targeted areas among larger numbers of subgrantees. Otherwise, changes in capacity are too scattered and inconsistent to show measurable changes across multiple grant recipients. The evaluation also recommends uniform technical assistance from the intermediary entity that implements the grant program. The outcomes evaluation found that the achievements were impaired by inconsistency in the technical assistance subgrantees received. In addition, the evaluation recommends that grants be awarded to organizations that have demonstrated ability to increase capacity. The selection process for identifying HOPE II grant recipients did not produce a subgrantee class that was uniformly likely to succeed. 7 appendixes that include supplementary tables, surveys, and the subgrantee application review form
  Main Term(s): Victim services
  Index Term(s): Volunteer programs ; Interagency cooperation ; Organization development ; Urban criminality ; Technical assistance resources ; NIJ final report ; Faith-Based Services for Crime Victims ; Faith-Based
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: TR-017
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: For the the summary and study reports see NCJ-224986 and 224987.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.