U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Genetic Influences on the Stability of Low Self-Control: Results From a Longitudinal Sample of Twins

NCJ Number
225254
Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 36 Issue: 6 Dated: November/December 2008 Pages: 478-486
Author(s)
Kevin M. Beaver; John Paul Wright; Matt DeLisi; Michael G. Vaughn
Date Published
November 2008
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This study examined the causes of self-control and the stability of self-control.
Abstract
Gottfredson and Hirschi’s 1990 theory has become one of the most tested and empirically supported criminological theories. Even so, much remains unknown about the causes of self-control and the stability of self-control. This study estimated the proportion of variance in self-control that was attributable to genetic factors, shared environmental factors, and nonshared environmental factors. The results of the model-fitting statistics revealed that genetic effects accounted for 64 percent of the variance in the Wave 1 low self-control scale and for 53 percent of the variance in the Wave 2 low self-control scale. The remaining variance was attributable to nonshared environmental influences. The shared environment did not explain any variance in any of the two self-control scales. The stability of self-control during adolescence was also examined. The results revealed some support in favor of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) stability postulate; the bivariate correlation between the Wave 1 and Wave 2 low self-control scales was r = .64. This suggests that levels of self-control remain relatively stable over the life course. Data for this study came from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which administered a self-report to 90,000 American adolescents in grades 7 through 12 attending 132 middle and high schools; followup interviews were conducted with a random sample of 20,745 adolescents and 17,700 of their primary caregivers in their home. Figures, table, note, and references