skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 225340   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Gendered Violence and Safety: A Contextual Approach to Improving Security in Women's Facilities: Part II of III: Focus Group Methodology and Findings
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Barbara Owen Ph.D. ; James Wells Ph.D. ; Joycelyn Pollock Ph.D., J.D. ; Bernadette Muscat Ph.D. ; Stephanie Tores M.S.
  Date Published: 11/2008
  Page Count: 158
  Annotation: This second part of a three-part report on a project that investigated the context of gendered violence and safety in women’s correctional facilities presents the study’s focus-group methodology and findings, with attention to the contextual factors and their correlates that contribute to female prisoners’ conflicts and violence.
  Abstract: Both the inmate and staff focus groups agreed that the causes of fighting and other forms of violence in the prison involve jealousy, debts, and disrespect as the major triggers for violence. The researchers argue, however, that these factors are dynamic contributors to the potential for violence; and they interact within the four levels of an Ecological Model that contains factors related to the individual, relationships, particular communities, and society in general. Members of the inmate focus group indicated that they became less worried about physical or sexual violence over the course of their incarceration. They expressed little confidence in the ability of staff members to protect them from violence, either from other female inmates or from staff. Staff felt that their ability to respond to violence among inmates was dependent on inmate reporting of incidents; however, inmates indicated there were significant barriers and liabilities in reporting feared or actual victimization. Other issues addressed in the focus groups were a continuum of violence among inmates, with a separate continuum for sexual violence, and a continuum of coercion in staff sexual misconduct with inmates. A total of 40 focus groups with 161 inmates and 30 staff participants were completed by the research team. The focus group method allowed participants to respond freely to questions regarding their perceptions and experiences. The descriptions of the methodology address the focus group questions, group protocol, the analysis of focus group content, and the characteristics of focus group participants. 11 appendixes that contain protocol, agendas, and forms, and 11 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections research
  Index Term(s): Correctional Personnel Training ; Data collection devices ; Violent inmates ; Inmate staff relations ; Research methods ; Inmate personal security ; Data collection ; Female inmates ; Womens correctional institutions ; Prisoner sexual assault ; Prison conditions ; Violence prevention ; Violent females
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2006-RP-BX-0016
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Reference NCJ 225338 for complete report, NCJ 225339 and NCJ 225341 for Parts I and III, and NCJ 225342 and 225343 for related bulletins.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.