skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 226201 Find in a Library
Title: Victim Responses to Sexual Assault: Counterintuitive or Simply Adaptive
Author(s): Patricia L. Fanflik
Corporate Author: National District Attorneys Assoc
United States of America
Date Published: August 2007
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: National District Attorneys Assoc
Alexandria, VA 22314
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women
Washington, DC 20530
Grant Number: 2004-WT-AX-K047
Sale Source: National District Attorneys Assoc
American Prosecutors Research Institute
99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 510
Alexandria, VA 22314
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Literature Review
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This monograph identifies and examines rape victims’ various psychological (e.g., depression, anger, or anxiety) and behavioral responses (e.g., not fighting back during a rape, continuing to date an assailant, or delayed reporting of the sexual assault) and considers why the victim’s response appear to be “counterintuitive” to the general public.
Abstract: A complex combination of individual characteristics and external factors influence how a woman will react to sexual victimization. Different psychological responses translate into different behavioral patterns or coping strategies for each survivor of sexual assault. Also, external factors--such as victim social support, severity of the assault, or a victim’s relationship to the assailant--may also have an impact on a victim’s psychological states and behaviors after a sexual assault. When the victim’s behavior does not meet normative expectations of the general public about how a sexual assault victim would logically feel and behave, this can raise doubts about the severity and the nonconsensual nature of an alleged assault. Rape myths include beliefs that rape is primarily sexually motivated (research shows it combines elements of power, anger, and sexuality); that rapists are primarily strangers to victims (most perpetrators are known to the victim); that the victim did something to cause the rape (no behavior warrants a person being raped); and that victims experience less psychological trauma when raped by an acquaintance (no differences have been found in victim psychological symptoms whether or not she knows the rapist). Public education about rape and prosecutors’ arguments to the jury in sexual assault cases should focus on the victim’s lack of consent to sexual contact with the perpetrator while cautioning the jury not to make judgments about the case based preconceptions about how sexual assault victims should feel and behave or the circumstance under which rape occurs. 1 figure and 58 references
Main Term(s): Sexual assault victims
Index Term(s): Attitudes toward victims; Coping; Psychological victimization effects; Public education; Public Opinion of Crime
Note: Downloaded March 11, 2009
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=248189

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.