skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 228276   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: An Assessment of Defense and Prosecutorial Strategies in Terrorism Trials: Implications for State and Federal Prosecutors
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Chris Shields ; Kelly R. Damphousse ; Brent L. Smith
Date Published: 12/2008
Page Count: 165
  Annotation: This study examined the courtroom processes and legal strategies used by Federal prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys for cases that involved an official terrorism investigation for the period 1980-2004, which consisted of just over 700 defendants indicted for 9,633 violations of Federal criminal law.
Abstract: The study found that the more politicized the prosecution strategy (tying the defendant’s ideological motivation to the elements of the case), the more likely the case would go to trial and the more likely it was to result in acquittal or dismissal. The most explicitly politicized prosecution strategies doubled the likelihood of acquittal and dismissal. Treating terrorist defendants like traditional offenders, on the other hand, resulted in the highest plea and conviction rates. Highly politicized defense strategies (portraying the government’s pursuit of terrorist defendants as a political “witch hunt”) was associated with an increase in the likelihood of conviction. In addition to obtaining data from the American Terrorism Study, which includes a statistical database of Federal indictments resulting from official FBI terrorism investigations for 1980-2004, data were collected from Federal court case records and other open sources, such as newspaper accounts of the trials. A former Assistant U.S. Attorney was the subject matter expert in identifying important pleadings, motions, and other key events that occurred in the trials. A total of 140 new variables were created in measuring these factors. Among the new variables were those that track information about the type of defense attorney used. The database included variables that measured whether the defendant received bail, and if not, the reason bail was denied. One set of variables tracked whether a superseding indictment was filed in each case. Another set of variables tracked the number of counts added or dropped from the original indictment. 40 tables, 46 references, and 9 appendixes with supplementary data
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Defense counsel ; Defense preparation ; Defense counsel effectiveness ; Case processing ; Terrorism prosecution
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2006-IJ-CX-0026
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.