skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 230034 Find in a Library
Title: Proactive Policing and Robbery Rates Across U.S. Cities
Journal: Criminology  Volume:48  Issue:1  Dated:February 2010  Pages:57-98
Author(s): Charis E. Kubrin; Steven F. Messner; Glenn Deane; Kelly McGeever; Thomas D. Stucky
Date Published: February 2010
Page Count: 42
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the effect of "proactive" policing (vigorous enforcement of laws against relatively minor offenses to prevent more serious crime) on robbery rates for a sample of large U.S. cities, using an innovative measure developed by Sampson and Cohen (1988).
Abstract: This replication of the Sampson and Cohen study using more recent data from a comparable sample of cities confirms their findings of a negative association between proactive policing and robbery rates when an analogous model is estimated. Further, the current findings show that their negative relationship is robust, at least for the sample investigated, indicating that proactive policing reduces robbery rates. The authors report that it is not possible in this study to identify the precise mechanisms that might be at work; however, the results of the analyses, in conjunction with earlier studies, provide ample grounds for more exploration into the connection between distinctive policing styles and violent crime rates. With greater knowledge of such mechanisms, it might be possible to design randomized experiments or quasi-experiments that would overcome the limitations inherent in any effort to make causal inferences on the basis of statistical modeling of correlational data. The authors further advise that whatever deterrent effects of proactive or any other policing style might prove to be, policy decisions must be informed not only by considerations of crime control, but by the fundamental values of a democratic society. For the independent variable, data were collected on robbery for all cities with populations of 100,000 and greater that were in the Uniform Crime Reports between 2000 and 2003. The primary independent variable was proactive policing. This variable is a ratio measured as the sum of the number of arrests for driving under the influence and disorderly conduct divided by the number of sworn police officers. 4 tables, 1 figure, 69 references, and appended technical details on the Arellano-Bond dynamic panel estimator
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Crime specific countermeasures; Disorderly conduct; Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Proactive police units; Robbery; Robbery control programs
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.