skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 230401 Find in a Library
Title: Alternatives to Custodial Supervision: The Day Fine
Author(s): Edwin W. Zedlewski
Date Published: April 2010
Page Count: 15
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study determined the extent to which “day fines” could become a legitimate and widespread form of punishment in the U.S. criminal justice system, so as to reduce the levels of custodial sentences.
Abstract: Day fines are monetary penalties imposed on an offender that take into account the offender’s financial means. The amount of a fine is determined by the severity of the offense and the offender’s daily income. Day fines could be an alternative to sanctions that require direct supervision, either in the community or an institution. This study concludes that day fines achieve many important benefits for criminal justice systems, especially the capability of reducing corrections populations. The drawbacks of day fines are essentially procedural, but are not so problematic as to outweigh the benefits. Moreover, the administrative structures of day fine systems are so varied that most systemic features can be accommodated. Previous experiences with day fines in the United States indicate that courts using them had little trouble incorporating day fines into their sentencing system and in computing fine amounts. The challenges involved monitoring and enforcing fine collections. European systems offer a variety of ways to address these challenges. The current study advises that fines should be imposed on a wide range of criminal offenses, including lesser felonies. Penalties may escalate for repeat offenses to include prison or jail, but probation sentences should be avoided. Combining fines with suspended sentences or community service will minimize the drain on system resources. After an overview of day fines, this paper describes the calculation of day fines, day fine systems in countries throughout the world, efforts to implement day fines in the United States, the strengths of day fines, and the weaknesses of day fines. Data needed to evaluate the use of day fines are also discussed. 26 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Day fines; Fine defaults; Sentencing factors
Note: NIJ Discussion Paper
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.