U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Predictors of Client Engagement and Attrition in Home-Based Child Maltreatment Prevention Services

NCJ Number
233693
Journal
Child Maltreatment Volume: 16 Issue: 1 Dated: February 2011 Pages: 9-20
Author(s)
Amy Damashek; Debby Doughty; Lisa Ware; Jane Silovsky
Date Published
February 2011
Length
12 pages
Annotation
This study examined the relative contribution of program, provider, family, and individual variables to service enrollment and completion of home-based child maltreatment prevention services.
Abstract
High rates of program attrition in home-based family support and child maltreatment prevention services are common. Research examining factors related to family engagement (i.e., enrollment and completion rates) may help program developers increase the impact of child abuse prevention services by reducing attrition. The present study examined the relative influence of provider, program, and individual factors from the Integrated Theory of Parent Involvement (ITPI) as well as maternal and family demographic and risk variables in predicting service enrollment and completion in a home-based child maltreatment prevention service (SafeCare+) and a standard community care program (Services as Usual [SAU]). Participants were 398 female caregivers of children ages 5 and below. Support was found for the primary role of program and provider factors in client enrollment and completion of services. Specifically, participants in SafeCare+ were 4 times more likely to enroll in services and 8.5 times more likely to complete services than those in SAU. Family risk variables including intimate partner psychological aggression, substance abuse, and depression were also significant predictors. Recommended next steps include integration of risk-related factors in the ITPI framework and disentangling specific provider and program factors related to service engagement. (Published Abstract) Figure, tables, and references