skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 234598     Find in a Library
Title: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policies for Reducing Sexual Violence against Women, Executive Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Elizabeth J. Letourneau Ph.D. ; Jill S. Levenson Ph.D. ; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay Ph.D. ; Debajyoti Sinha Ph.D. ; Kevin S. Armstrong
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 6
  Annotation: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of one state’s sex offender registration and notification policy in reducing sexual violence.
Abstract: The problem of sexual violence is a national legislative priority as evidenced by numerous sex offender-specific policies enacted at the Federal level over the past 15 years. Specifics vary among States regarding criminal justice responses to sex offending, but all such policies have as their primary goals the prevention of sexual violence and the reduction of sexual re-offending. This study examined the effects of comprehensive registration and community notification policies on rates of sexual violence in South Carolina. Specifically, broad sex offender registration and notification policies have reduced recidivism or deterred new sexual offenses and whether unintended effects of broad registration and notification policies have occurred. Results from this program of research indicate that: 1) Sex offender registration and notification (SORN), as implemented in South Carolina, appears to have a positive impact on general deterrence associated with averting new, first-time sex crimes. 2) SORN policy has no effect on deterring the risk of sexual recidivism. 3) SORN policy does exert unintended effects on judicial decision making with respect to adult sex crime cases. An increased number of defendants were permitted to plead to non-sex charges following the onset of SORN policy and following its modification to require online notification. The net effects of this change could be to reduce community safety by increasing the likelihood that defendants guilty of sex crimes pleaded to non-sex crimes or were acquitted altogether. 4) It does not appear that registered sex offenders who failure to register are more sexually dangerous than compliant registrants.
Main Term(s): Sex offenders
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Sex offender profiles ; Sex Offender Registration/Registries ; NIJ final report ; South Carolina
Sponsoring Agency: NLECTC Small, Rural, Tribal and Border Regional Ctr
United States of America
Grant Number: 2006-WG-BX-0002
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.