U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evaluation of the Colorado Integrated System of Care Family Advocacy Demonstration Programs for Mental Health Juvenile Justice Populations, Interim Report -- Year Two

NCJ Number
235538
Author(s)
Kerry Cataldo; Kevin Ford
Date Published
January 2010
Length
54 pages
Annotation
This second interim report on Colorado's family advocacy demonstration programs for youth with mental health and co-occurring health and behavioral problems describes updates to the study design, a program description of the new rural pilot site, the identification of comparison groups, program challenges, and preliminary data.
Abstract
Data were collected for the period of January 1, 2008, through August 31, 2009. As of August 31, 2009, 69 juveniles had participated in the family advocacy demonstration programs (30 in the urban program, 29 in the suburban program, and 10 in the rural Teller program). The urban and suburban sites met their enrollment goals. Just over 50 percent of the youth participants have been discharged from their respective family advocacy programs; 10 of the discharges were unsuccessful completions due to families moving from the service area, requesting withdrawal from the program, or becoming unresponsive or unreachable for unknown reasons. As of February 16, 2009, the rural site in Teller County concluded its family advocacy service and withdrew their family advocacy demonstration program from the study. The primary evaluation activities have been irreparably impeded. Currently, 34 youth are active participants in the three family advocacy programs, including the new rural site in Montrose County. The type of family advocacy services provided to clients and their families include contact with the youth's supervising officer, treatment providers, and school staff; attendance at court hearings and client service staffings; conducting home visits; and regularly staying in touch with the youth and family. Evaluation researchers have worked with the family advocacy sites to assist in the difficult and time-consuming task of identifying viable comparison groups and developing measurement procedures. In the coming months of the evaluation, researchers will continue to collect and analyze data from interviews, paper-and-pencil measures, and consumer and site-level information. 16 tables, 2 references, and appended relevant State legislation