skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 235712   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Test Results for Mobile Device Acquisition Tool: AFLogical 1.4
Corporate Author: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
United States of America
Date Published: 12/2011
Page Count: 70
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2003-IJ-R-029
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Test/Measurement
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the results from testing AFLogical Version 1.4, against the “Smart Phone Tool Test Assertions and Test Plan.”
Abstract: The tool logically acquired active data elements from the mobile device internal memory completely and accurately, except for the following cases: a case where acquisition of Personal- Information-Management data was attempted, and a case where acquisition of Multimedia-Messaging-Service data was attempted. In addition, in a case that tested the tool’s behavior when connectivity is interrupted, the tool failed to notify the user that the acquisition had been disrupted. Five anomalies were observed in the testing. First, graphics files associated with address book entries were not reported. Second, regular and maximum length Personal-Information-Management (PIM) data were not reported. Third, Maximum-length PIM data (memos) were not reported. Fourth, the textual portions of outgoing Multimedia-Messaging-Service (MMS) messages were not reported. Fifth, notification of device disruption during acquisition was not successful. Two sections of this report provide justification for the selection of test cases and assertions from the set of possible cases defined in the test plan for smart phone forensic tools. The test cases are generally selected based on features offered by the tool. Another section of the report lists the hardware and software used to conduct the test cases. The report’s concluding section describes each test case, test assertions used in the test case, the expected result, and the actual result. Extensive tables
Main Term(s): Science and Technology
Index Term(s): Computer aided operations ; Computer hardware systems ; Computer software ; Computers ; Computer related crime ; Computer evidence ; NIJ grant-related documents
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=257693

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.