U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Prescription Drug Control: DEA Has Enhanced Efforts To Combat Diversion, but Could Better Assess and Report Program Results

NCJ Number
236087
Date Published
August 2011
Length
55 pages
Annotation
The U.S. General Accountability Office reports on its study of how the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) manages its investigation of the illegal diversion of prescription drugs for abuse, how DEA ensures policies and procedures are followed for investigations, as well as the extent to which DEA determines the results of its investigations.
Abstract
Because of the increased deployment of resources and personnel, the number of DEA regulatory investigations of the distribution of controlled prescription drugs more than tripled between fiscal years 2009 and 2010. DEA also conducted outreach to specific registrant types in order to inform them of their regulatory responsibilities and prepare them for regulatory investigations. DEA has taken steps to ensure that investigators follow policies and procedures for such investigations, but it could better assess how its efforts are reducing the diversion of prescription drugs. DEA has established internal controls for guiding, training, and oversight of investigations, and DEA monitors the quality of investigations through a combination of direct supervisory reviews, self-inspections, and on-site internal inspections by DEA's Office of Inspections. GAO recommends that DEA reassess the program's performance measures to better link them to the goal of reducing diversion. GAO did not agree with this recommendation; however, GAO continues to believe the outcome measures could be improved as discussed in the report. GAO reviewed DEA policies and procedures; and it interviewed DEA, State, and local officials at 11 locations that were selected on the basis of volume of cases handled, geographic diversity, and other considerations. 2 tables and 3 figures