The two experiments that composed this study found that adult respondents (students and parents alike), regardless of risk for committing CPA, showed evidence of automatic negative evaluative reactions to child photos compared to adult photos. The data also suggest that this effect is a consequence of adults' implicit negative evaluation of their age out-group (children) relative to their age in-group (adults), and this in-group/out-group bias emerges regardless of the facial expression depicted in the photos. Although both high-CPA-risk parents and low-CPA-risk parents exhibited implicit negative evaluative biases toward children, it is possible that these parent groups may differ in how they manage these initial negative evaluative reactions. Low-risk parents tended to respond to perceived out-groups with empathy, support, and generosity; whereas, high risk parents had low levels of empathy for out-groups, tending to be harsh, judgmental, and punitive toward those perceived as different from themselves. The first study was conducted on a student sample (n=95), and the second study was conducted on a parent sample (n=95). The study used an implicit "evaluative priming procedure" in which participants were instructed to make decisions about the evaluative implications of target words. These words were preceded by photographs of child faces or adult faces displaying positive, neutral, or negative expressions. Reaction times for the evaluative decisions were used as an index of the extent to which photos invoked negative or positive evaluative reactions. 2 tables and 39 references