skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 237193   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Collecting DNA from Juveniles
Author(s): Julie E. Samuels ; Allison M. Dwyer ; Robin Halberstadt ; Pamela Lachman
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 04/2011
Page Count: 84
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2008F_08163
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Legislation/Policy Description ; Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the laws, policies, and practices involved in States’ collection of juvenile DNA, along with implications for juvenile and criminal justice systems.
Abstract: Although 30 States currently have laws that authorize the collection of DNA from juveniles - mostly those adjudicated delinquent - little is known about the implementation of these laws or how existing procedures have been applied to juveniles. Consequently, policymakers and practitioners lack guidance on how well these laws are working in practice or how to improve current laws and practices. This study found the following: legal frameworks for the collection of DNA from juveniles vary by State; juvenile DNA expungement was rare; juvenile records expungement does not trigger DNA profile expungement; coordination challenges exist between labs and juvenile justice agencies; laws and implementation policies may be ambiguous; ensuring collection from all eligible offenders can be difficult; and the number and characteristics of juvenile profiles in CODIS cannot be quantified. Eight policy implications and recommendations are offered for State and Federal policymakers as well as State CODIS laboratory staff. First, consider (or reconsider) whether juveniles should be treated differently from adults regarding the scope of DNA collection, particularly for juvenile arrestees. Second, examine whether expungement policies are working as intended and consider ways to disseminate information about expungement standards and procedures. Third, align standards for expunging DNA profiles with standards for expunging juvenile records. Fourth, draft laws and policies that clearly indicate agency roles, responsibilities, and relationships regarding compliance, collection, quality control, and expungement. Fifth, address how DNA collection laws interact with existing juvenile justice laws and practices. Sixth, recognize that without additional resources, labs cannot expand the scope of qualified offenders and address their backlogs. Seventh, monitor changes in the collection and use of DNA that could have implications for juveniles. Eighth, encourage labs to compile and publicize basic aggregate descriptive data associated with CODIS profiles, which could improve oversight of the laws and facilitate future research. A 42-item annotated bibliography
Main Term(s): Juvenile processing
Index Term(s): Right to Due Process ; Rights of the accused ; Suspect identification ; State laws ; Juvenile case records ; DNA fingerprinting ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259220

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.