skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 237674     Find in a Library
  Title: Do Reentry Courts Reduce Recidivism?: Results From the Harlem Parole Reentry Court
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Zachary Hamilton
  Corporate Author: Center for Court Innovation
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2010
  Page Count: 45
  Annotation: This evaluation assessed the impact of the Harlem Parole Reentry Court following program modifications that were implemented after an initial formative evaluation.
  Abstract: The evaluation found that reentry court parolees (including both graduates and failures) were less likely to be rearrested than parolees who did not participate in a reentry court; however only some effects approached statistical significance (misdemeanor rearrests over the first year and drug-related rearrests over the first 2 years). In addition, reentry court parolees were less likely to be reconvicted, and the effects were significant at 1, 2, and 3 years (56 percent compared to 36 percent at 3 years). Additional analyses indicated that reentry court parolees who completed the program experienced lower odds of rearrest and revocation. Pre-intervention characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of program completion included prior parole term, marriage/cohabitation, high school diploma or GED, and prior drug treatment. Although reentry court parolees were more likely to be revoked and returned to prison than parolees who did not participate in the reentry court, this may be due to the more intensive supervision and monitoring of reentry court parolees. This suggests that reentry courts may need to explore the use of alternative sanctions in lieu of revocation. The Harlem Parole Reentry Court was established in June of 2001 in response to the high concentration of parolees returning to the East Harlem neighborhood of Manhattan. The reentry court provides intensive judicial oversight, supervision, and services to new parolees during the first 6 months after release from State prison. The program’s goal is to stabilize returning parolees in the initial phase of their reintegration by helping them to find jobs, secure housing, remain drug-free, and assume familial and personal responsibilities. Following graduation, participants are transferred to traditional parole supervision. 7 tables, 3 figures, and 70 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Probation or parole services ; Recidivism ; Court of limited jurisdiction ; Parole conditions ; Court procedures ; Court studies ; Parole effectiveness ; Parole supervision ; New York ; Reentry
  Sale Source: Center for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.