skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 237914   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach
  Document URL: PDF 
Corporate Author: Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis
United States of America
Date Published: 02/2012
Page Count: 248
  Annotation: This is the report of the Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis, which was charged with developing an understanding of the role of human factors and their contributions to errors in latent print analysis, followed by the development of guidelines for reducing the incidence of human error in latent print analysis and the offering of recommendations for future research.
Abstract: “Human factors” issues can arise in any experience-based and judgment-based analytical process such as latent print examination. Human factors that can diminish the accuracy and reliability of latent print examination include inadequate training, extraneous knowledge about the suspects or other matters in the cases, poor judgment, health problems, limitations of vision, complex technology, and stress. Human factors related to the documentation and communication of an examiner’s work and findings are also impacted by human factors. This analysis of the role of human factors in latent print examination focuses on various aspects of the examination and reporting process. Topics addressed are performing analysis, comparison, evaluation, and verification; reporting and testifying; managing the process; improving training and education; providing facilities and equipment, and supporting research efforts. For each of these issues, recommendations are offered for minimizing the adverse impact of human factors that are critical in arriving at accurate and reliable interpretations of latent print examination. A major emphasis is the use of the process known as ACE-V, which organizes the interpretations and decisions of an examiner into a useful and logical sequence. A criticism of this process is that it does not detail the substantive content of the various steps. Recommendations are offered for increasing the transparency of the process and insulating the examiner from extraneous influences. Recommendations are offered for reporting and testifying, managing the process, improving training and education, providing facilities and equipment, and supporting research efforts. 13 boxes, 17 figures, 23 tables, and a bibliography
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Fingerprints ; Decisionmaking ; Fingerprint classification ; Discretionary decisions ; Investigative techniques
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
United States of America

National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES)
United States of America
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Technical Assistance)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.