skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 242822 Find in a Library
Title: Minotaur Defense: The Myth of the Pathological Intoxication Defense
Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:49  Issue:4  Dated:Fall 2012  Pages:1969-1999
Author(s): Tim Feulner
Date Published: 2012
Page Count: 31
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the use of the pathological intoxication defense in criminal law.
Abstract: The pathological intoxication defense is used in criminal law to describe an “aggressive and often violent state triggered in some individuals by only a small amount of alcohol.” In the psychiatric community, however, the use of pathological intoxication is no longer supported as a reliable diagnosis, and recommendations have been made to drop the diagnosis entirely from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This finding however, has not carried over to the use of pathological intoxication as a viable defense in criminal law. The author argues that given the current lack of support for the diagnosis in the psychiatric community, and the fact that the defense itself is inconsistent with basic principles of criminal law the use of pathological intoxication should be dropped from criminal court cases. To support this argument, the author begins with a discussion of the medical debate surrounding pathological intoxication, and examines whether it is a specific, distinct syndrome or rather a range of symptoms that are more appropriately classified as part or parts of other disorders. This is followed by an analysis of the use of the defense and its incorporation into the Model Penal Code. The fourth section of the article examines the relevance of the psychiatric community’s interpretation of pathological intoxication and its use in criminal law. The fifth section of the article discusses the five defenses under which pathological intoxication can be used: a mens rea defense, an automatism defense, an insanity defense, an involuntary intoxication defense, and a pathological intoxication defense. The final section of the article presents a new way for using the pathological intoxication defense by incorporating the research findings from the psychiatric community.
Main Term(s): Alcohol-crime relationship
Index Term(s): Alcohol abuse; Defense; Incapacitation theory; Insanity defense; Psychiatric testimony; Psychological theories; Selective incapacitation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.