skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 243158 
Title: Sex Offender, the Polygraph, and Community Corrections (From Handbook of Sex Offender Treatment, P 67-1 - 67-11, 2011, Barbara K. Schwartz, ed. - See NCJ-243091)
Author(s): Pryor Green, B.S.; Billy Franklin, B.S.; Randi Sue Lanzafama, B.S., M.Ed.
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: Civic Research Institute, Inc
Kingston, NJ 08528-9982
Sale Source: Civic Research Institute, Inc
4478 US Route 27
P.O. Box 585
Kingston, NJ 08528-9982
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.civicresearchinstitute.com 
Type: Historical Overview; Test/Measurement
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter reviews the history of and rationale for sex offender polygraph testing, followed by a discussion of polygraph procedures that achieve effective results in the community-based management of sex offenders.
Abstract: Illinois Judge Clarence E. Partee introduced polygraph testing of sex offenders in 1966. He required that sex offenders given probation take an annual polygraph examination as a probation condition. Given the measured significant decline in sex offender recidivism in programs that have used polygraph testing, other States have instituted polygraph testing for sex offenders. In community corrections, a risk assessment is necessary for the effective community supervision of sex offenders. The polygraph examination is an indispensable part of this assessment. In the Newport News Sex Offender Program, for example, information revealed by the polygraph determines the intensity of supervision and treatment based on the nature and frequency of past sexual offending revealed by polygraph testing. Before an offender is given a polygraph exam, the team has already given him every opportunity to disclose all the relevant matters pertinent to treatment. If the polygraph subsequently exposes deception, the examiner confronts the offender, which may prompt further disclosures from the offender. The examiner notifies the probation/parole officer and the therapist in a written report, which includes the relevant questions. The polygraph should be used as an investigative, risk assessment, and treatment tool, not as a final arbitrator of guilt or innocence. Separate sections of this chapter discuss the determination of questions that will be asked the offender, the scope of background information on the offender given the polygrapher before the exam, and procedures for finding a qualified polygraph examiner. 2 figures and 4 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Case management; Intensive supervision programs; Offender supervision; Polygraph techniques; Polygraphs; Sex offenders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=265233

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.