skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 243835     Find in a Library
Title: Evaluability Assessments of the Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) Model, Site Report: COSA Fresno
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Ian A. Elliott, Ph.D. ; Gary Zajac, Ph.D. ; Courtney A. Meyer, M.A.
Date Published: 07/2013
Page Count: 30
  Annotation: This study identified issues that should be considered in an evaluation design for Fresno’s (California) Circles of Support and Accountability, a restorative justice-based community reentry program for high-risk sex offenders with little or no pro-social community support.
Abstract: The Fresno COSA (“COSA Fresno”) was part of a five-site assessment of COSA programs in the United States, in order to determine whether the programs had reached a stage of development and operation suitable for a rigorous evaluation. Overall, this assessment concluded that although operations at COSA Fresno are impressive given the limited resources available, significant investment in the site would be required in order to resolve evaluation methodology issues and obstacles that currently make COSA Fresno a poor candidate for rigorous evaluation. If such an investment were made, this assessment recommends that COSA Fresno be included in any evaluation of the effectiveness of COSA in the United States. At the time of this assessment, COSA Fresno had 25 Circles in operation. The program had deviated from the intended model in a number of ways. The intended model was derived from the COSA model developed in Ontario, Canada. First, some “core members” had not completed their full sentence, as they had been released into the community under a combination of COSA and formal parole supervision. Second, volunteer applicants for a staff position had not been subjected to an official criminal records check or a check of personal references. In addition, there were two key obstacles to an evaluation of COSA Fresno. There was concern for the financial viability of the site in the long term, and the limited number of COSA Fresno participants limited the potential for a sample size needed for a rigorous evaluation of the program’s impact. 2 figures and 18 references
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Social conditions ; Socially challenged ; Sex offenders ; Program implementation ; Socialization ; Post-release programs ; Social skills training ; Treatment techniques ; Sex offender treatment ; NIJ final report ; California ; Reentry ; Restorative Justice
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0008
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Grants and Funding
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: For the cross-site report, see NCJ-243832; for other site reports, see NCJ-243833-34 and NCJ-243836-37
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.