skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 243839   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of the Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification Program, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Seri Irazola, Ph.D. ; Erin Williamson ; Emily Niedzwiecki ; Sara Debus-Sherill ; Julie Stricker
Corporate Author: ICF International (formerly Caliber Associates)
United States of America
Date Published: 10/2013
Page Count: 359
  Annotation: This report presents the findings and methodology of an evaluation of the federally funded automated victim notification (AVN) system, which intends to provide crime victims timely and accurate information on court events and status changes in the course of their case processing.
Abstract: To date, 47 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico operate some form of AVN system. Evaluation findings suggest that States have implemented AVN systems under a diverse set of structural designs. Underlying these structural differences are issues related to program operation, program administration, stakeholder participation, and target population. In developing and implementing AVN, the evaluation advises that States must decide whether they want a vendor-based or in-house system, as well as whether AVN services will be available to all public users or closed/restricted to a subpopulation (e.g., victims and criminal justice professionals). The evaluation identified benefits and limitations for each type of system. The evaluation also determined that administrative structure and stakeholder “buy-in” are critical to AVN success. Generally, States are advised to limit the number of individuals responsible for the financial and operational management of an AVN system and develop a system to reduce turnover. In addition, States should provide comprehensive AVN services in all facilities that have contact with offenders. There should be one system that allows for seamless registration and, when applicable, under one vendor contract. In addition, victims should be informed about what services are and are not provided through the AVN system. Although this evaluation was not designed to examine the extent to which AVN provided victim notification in a legally sufficient manner, evaluation findings suggest the need for additional research to determine whether legal mandates are met through AVN systems. Evaluation methodology and limitations are explained. Case study reports, 12 references, and appended evaluation instruments, legislative profiles, and AVN system profiles
Main Term(s): Victim services
Index Term(s): Automated court systems ; Automation ; Victim Services Notification ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-VN-CX-K102
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Grants and Funding
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: For related reports, see NCJ-243840-43
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.