skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 243898 Find in a Library
Title: Future of Body-Worn Cameras for Law Enforcement
Journal: TECHBeat  Dated:Fall 2013  Pages:8-10
Author(s): Michele Coppola
Date Published: 2013
Page Count: 3
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Report (Technical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on the results of the pilot testing of body-worn cameras for law enforcement officers by the San Mateo Police Department (California), and suggests ways to improve upon the usefulness and capabilities of these cameras for police officers.
Abstract: Unlike vehicle-mounted cameras, the body-worn cameras travel with officers when they are involved in incidents that require them to move out of the range of the vehicle camera. Proponents of body-worn camera view it as a tool to protect officers from false accusations, reduce agency liability and citizen complaints, and provide evidence for court presentation. Although these arguments are persuasive, when the body-worn camera was pilot tested with officers of the San Mateo Police Department (SMPD), limitations of the body-worn camera were identified. According to Capt. Wayne Hoss of the SMPD, after testing the body-worn camera for the past 3 years, the SMPD determined that none of the cameras tested was ready for full-time wearing by police officers. They were not recording what officers wanted them to see. The camera’s perspective is not the perspective viewed by the officer unless it is mounted on the officer’s head. It works well for officers who wear a helmet. Another challenge is current battery life. Even with limited use, current batteries last only long enough for one shift. As capabilities are added and the cameras have increased use, the current batteries are inadequate. The challenge is to have stronger batteries that would not make the camera too large for officer comfort. Expanded capabilities recommended by Capt. Hoss are for the reading of license plates and facial features of suspects who may be wanted. He has been discussing these improvements with industry representatives.
Main Term(s): Police equipment
Index Term(s): California; Camera technology; Equipment evaluation
Note: For other articles in this issue, see NCJ-243896-97 and NCJ-243899-900.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=265975

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.