skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 244050     Find in a Library
  Title: Evading Justice: The Pervasive Nature of Witness Intimidation
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): John Wilkinson, J.D. ; Christopher Mallios, J.D. ; Rhonda Martinson, J.D.
  Corporate Author: AEquitas
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2013
  Page Count: 3
  Annotation: This overview of witness intimidation first defines it and then discusses the following related issues: the characteristics of perpetrators and targets, where witness intimidation occurs, how it impacts the criminal justice system, and what can be done to counter it.
  Abstract: “Witness intimidation” can include “any conduct that discourages witnesses from meaningfully participating in the various stages of the criminal justice process.” Typically, the defendant in the case initiates witness intimidation in order to either keep the witness from testifying at trial or providing incriminating information to investigators. The witnesses targeted are those whom the perpetrator perceives as having incriminating information or observations that increase the likelihood he/she will be identified as a suspect, arrested, or be convicted of the crime. Intimidation can and has occurred wherever a victim, witness, or criminal justice practitioner is located. Intimidators will go anywhere that the target can be accessed, including where the target lives, works, or spends leisure time. Several studies have shown that witness intimidation does succeed in reducing meaningful participation in a case by victims and witnesses, resulting in decreased offender accountability, the undermining of the justice process, and a threat to public safety. Research on the nature, prevalence, and methods of witness intimidation must underlie the development of strategies to counter it. Traditional responses to witness intimidation include vigorous prosecutions, witness relocation programs, intensive monitoring of offenders, and upgrades in courtroom safety. In addition, witnesses and victims should be informed about the potential for intimidation; the importance of reporting it; methods that might be used; and the recording of times, places, events, and individuals involved in intimidation. 19 notes
  Main Term(s): Court security
  Index Term(s): Crime specific countermeasures ; Criminal methods ; Victim-witness intimidation ; BJA grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2010-MU-BX-K079
  Sale Source: AEquitas
1100 H. Street, Suite 310
Washington, DC 20005
United States of America
  Type: Instructional Material ; Technical Assistance
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Strategies in Brief, Issue 16, March 2013
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.