skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 244498     Find in a Library
  Title: Improving Courtroom Communication: A Procedural Justice Experiment in Milwaukee
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Erin J. Farley ; Elise Jensen ; Michael Rempel
  Corporate Author: Center for Court Innovation
United States of America
  Date Published: 01/2014
  Page Count: 88
  Annotation: This evaluation of a pilot project explored defendant perceptions of procedural justice.
  Abstract: This document provides an evaluation of a pilot project at the Milwaukee County Criminal Court to enhance defendant perceptions of procedural justice by improving the oral, written, and nonverbal communication used by judges. In court settings, procedural justice concerns the role of fair and respectful procedures and interpersonal treatment in shaping assessments of legal authorities and reactions to specific case outcomes. Among the findings, courtroom observations measured an increase in the use of 14 practices that helped improve communication. Judges became more likely to begin the court session by explaining why cases would be called in a certain order; make eye contact with defendants; use plain English to explain procedures and decisions; ask if defendants or their attorneys had anything to say before the decision; and demonstrate an interest in the defendants understanding of plea agreements. Study findings indicate that the one-day training and subsequent development of judicial action plans can lead to concrete improvements in courtroom communication. The most influential dimensions of procedural justice were found to be voice (perceived ability to convey one's side of the story), respect (perceived respectful treatment), and helpfulness (perceived interest in meeting defendant’s needs). This study confirmed a consistent theme in other recent research that perceptions of the judge play the most critical role in influencing overall defendant impressions of their court experience. Tables, figures, references, and appendixes
  Main Term(s): Court procedures
  Index Term(s): Judges ; Court personnel ; Trial procedures ; Role perception ; Criminal procedures ; Communication techniques ; BJA grant-related documents ; Wisconsin
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Sale Source: Center for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.