skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 244534     Find in a Library
  Title: Project Research to Action in Mentoring, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Sharon Johnson
  Date Published: 12/2013
  Page Count: 17
  Annotation: Methodology and outcomes are presented for the Project Research to Action in Mentoring, which compared the effectiveness of one-on-one mentoring to group mentoring in reducing delinquency among youth at risk for problem behaviors.
  Abstract: Although the data presented do not indicate any differences in one-on-one compared to group mentoring outcomes, the sample sizes were small and implementation issues handicapped the group mentoring effort. Thus, there was more success in maintaining mentoring relationships when they were one-on-one. The project was successful in recruiting the targeted number of youth who represented varying levels of risk for delinquent behavior based on their baseline self-reported problem behaviors; however, due to challenges in maintaining matches, the sample sizes across the mentoring types, stratified by three levels of risk, were not sufficiently large to test this goal of the research. In exploring differences in long-term (12 months and 18 months) outcomes for group mentoring compared to one-on-one mentoring and risk levels, those youth who were assessed at 18 months, when the mentoring relationship had ended, did not differ in their scores from baseline, indicating that no significant changes had occurred. The sample size was too small to conduct analyses across mentoring type and risk levels. The project was a collaborative effort between the University of Missouri-St. Louis, Alliance for Families & Communities Affected by Incarceration (AFCAI), and Better Family Life (BFL). AFCAI and BFL were selected due to their established community-based mentoring programs that target at-risk youth. Both agencies agreed to undertake the research study by incorporating randomization and systematic programming into their existing mentoring approaches. This report describes the research design, mentoring models, sample characteristics for youth and mentors, the matching procedure, and performance measures. Implementation issues and challenges are also discussed. 2 figures, 2 tables, and 14 references
  Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
  Index Term(s): Comparative analysis ; Services effectiveness ; Children at risk ; Adolescents at risk ; Juvenile Mentoring Programs ; Mentoring (juvenile)
  Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2010-JU-FX-0114
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.