skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 244703     Find in a Library
Title: Exploring Reasonable Efforts in Child Welfare Cases that Include Domestic Violence in Princeton, West Virginia
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Lorie Sicafuse ; Steve Wood M.S. ; Alicia Summers Ph.D.
Corporate Author: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
United States of America
Date Published: 10/2013
Page Count: 19
  Annotation: This study examined how child abuse and neglect cases with co-occurring domestic violence (DV) are treated in the family court of Princeton, WV, as well as whether this treatment differs from cases without domestic violence.
Abstract: The study found that efforts are being made to hold DV perpetrators accountable and minimize DV victim blaming in such cases. Child abuse and neglect cases with co-occurring DV were more likely to be in the father’s name than non-DV cases. Primary allegations against the mother were significantly less common in DV cases. Petitions identified the perpetrator in 100 percent of DV cases. Despite having the opportunity to co-petition, only two mothers did so in DV cases. Presenting problems and service referrals differed in DV and non-DV cases. Substance abuse was more often identified as a presenting problem for mothers in non-DV cases, than for mothers in DV cases. Mothers in non-DV cases were more likely to be referred for substance abuse services. Fathers in DV cases were more likely to receive referrals for parenting classes and psychological evaluations. There was little documentation of DV-specific service referrals. There was no evidence that DV victim advocates were involved in cases with co-occurring DV or were present at any of the hearings. Reunification was more common in DV cases than in non-DV cases. The authors caution that these findings are based on a limited sample, and not all initial study objectives could be achieved due to lack of case information. Using a structured case file review instrument, researchers examined 20 cases of child abuse and neglect with DV and comparison cases with no indication of DV. Information collected included petition language regarding DV, specific allegations, court orders, reasonable efforts, and services to all parties. 7 figures and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Court research
Index Term(s): Family courts ; Dispositions ; Comparative analysis ; Child abuse and neglect hearings ; OJJDP final report ; West Virginia ; Domestic/Intimate Partner Violence
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-MU-MU-K001
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.