skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 245374 Find in a Library
Title: Advancing the Quality of Cost-Benefit Analysis for Justice Programs
Author(s): Carl Matthies
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: March 2014
Page Count: 52
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Vera Institute of Justice
New York, NY 10279
Grant Number: 2009-MU-BX K029
Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Instructional Material; Report (Technical Assistance)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This white paper identifies and discusses the main methodological challenges in performing cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) of justice-system investments, based largely on input from the Cost-Benefits Methods Working Group convened by the Vera Institute of Justice in 2012.
Abstract: Whereas other forms of economic analysis, such as fiscal-impact studies, typically adopt the narrow perspective of a single government agency, CBA focuses on capturing the costs and benefits to all parties impacted by the policy being examined. This means including not only the perspectives of organized stakeholders, but also of all relevant members of society, so as to provide a complete appreciation of the policy’s impact. The first section of this paper provides some background on perspectives, including the perspectives typically included in justice-related CBAs, and it explains how to select the perspectives to include in a CBA. Section 2 addresses the evaluation component of CBA, i.e., predicting or measuring program impacts. CBA uses evaluation as an empirical basis for assessing the impacts, both beneficial and detrimental, of a program. These effects are then converted into dollar amounts in determining the program’s net value. Section 3 focuses on valuing the costs and impacts of justice policies and programs. This section includes a discussion about estimating the costs of implementing a justice policy or program and then focuses on valuing the impacts on taxpayers, victims, offenders, and the rest of society. Section 4 considers how to deal with uncertainty in impacts. It presents an overview of sensitivity analysis and describes four types: partial sensitivity analysis, best-case and worst-case scenarios, break-even analysis, and Monte Carlo analysis. Section 5 discusses how to make CBAs clearer and more accessible. In a concluding comment, the author advises that, “even if not all costs and benefits can be adequately evaluated, going through the disciplined thought process of conducting a CBA can yield useful information and insights to aid in the decisionmaking process." 17 figures and appended discussion of regression analysis
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): BJA Grant-related Documents; Cost/Benefit Analysis; Evaluation techniques; Research methods
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.