skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

JUSTINFO

Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 245374     Find in a Library
Title: Advancing the Quality of Cost-Benefit Analysis for Justice Programs
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Carl Matthies
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 03/2014
Page Count: 52
  Annotation: This white paper identifies and discusses the main methodological challenges in performing cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) of justice-system investments, based largely on input from the Cost-Benefits Methods Working Group convened by the Vera Institute of Justice in 2012.
Abstract: Whereas other forms of economic analysis, such as fiscal-impact studies, typically adopt the narrow perspective of a single government agency, CBA focuses on capturing the costs and benefits to all parties impacted by the policy being examined. This means including not only the perspectives of organized stakeholders, but also of all relevant members of society, so as to provide a complete appreciation of the policy’s impact. The first section of this paper provides some background on perspectives, including the perspectives typically included in justice-related CBAs, and it explains how to select the perspectives to include in a CBA. Section 2 addresses the evaluation component of CBA, i.e., predicting or measuring program impacts. CBA uses evaluation as an empirical basis for assessing the impacts, both beneficial and detrimental, of a program. These effects are then converted into dollar amounts in determining the program’s net value. Section 3 focuses on valuing the costs and impacts of justice policies and programs. This section includes a discussion about estimating the costs of implementing a justice policy or program and then focuses on valuing the impacts on taxpayers, victims, offenders, and the rest of society. Section 4 considers how to deal with uncertainty in impacts. It presents an overview of sensitivity analysis and describes four types: partial sensitivity analysis, best-case and worst-case scenarios, break-even analysis, and Monte Carlo analysis. Section 5 discusses how to make CBAs clearer and more accessible. In a concluding comment, the author advises that, “even if not all costs and benefits can be adequately evaluated, going through the disciplined thought process of conducting a CBA can yield useful information and insights to aid in the decisionmaking process." 17 figures and appended discussion of regression analysis
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Cost/Benefit Analysis ; Research methods ; Evaluation techniques ; BJA grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-MU-BX K029
Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America
Type: Instructional Material ; Report (Technical Assistance)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=267459

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.