skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 246494     Find in a Library
  Title: An Introduction to Evidence-Based Practices
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Stan Orchowsky, Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: Justice Research and Statistics Association
United States of America
  Date Published: 04/2014
  Page Count: 22
  Annotation: This paper presents a brief history of the evidence-based practices (EBPs) movement and discusses what is meant by evidence, from where it comes, sources of information on EBPs, the implementation of EBPs, and what to do when there is no evidence for a particular program or practice.
  Abstract: The current EBP movement originated in the field of medicine, when, beginning in the mid-1800s, parallel trends that involved the increased use of scientific methods, statistical analysis, and discoveries from the natural sciences increased interest in distinguishing between effective and ineffective medical treatments based on patient outcomes. Throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, criminal justice researchers who undertook the summarizing of what was known about effective programs were concerned with describing what the evidence showed about what types of interventions were effective; however there was no systematic effort to identify specific programs that were shown to be effective, nor to rate the quality of the studies that led to their conclusions. In recent years, evaluation methods for criminal justice programs have improved, along with the dissemination of information needed for replication. As used in the EBP movement in criminal justice, the objective for effectiveness is reduction in the continuation of the criminal behavior being targeted for treatment. This paper reviewed the criteria for such evidence. The paper reviewed the nature of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared two groups: one that received the intervention and a matched group that was similar to the treatment group but did not receive the treatment. It also notes that features of quasi experiments and non-experiments that for various reasons cannot be subjected to RCT. In addition, the paper discusses how much evidence is sufficient to establish a program or policy’s effectiveness, and the use of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of cumulative research in a particular area. 36 references and suggested resources
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): BJA grant-related documents ; Evidence-Based Practices ; Evidence-Based Research ; Evidence-Based Programs
  Sponsoring Agency: National Criminal Justice Association (NCJA)
United States of America

Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2010-DJ-BX-K176
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Instructional Material ; Report (Technical Assistance) ; Issue Overview
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: See NCJ-246495 for the Executive Summary
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.