skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 246782 Find in a Library
Title: Applying a Justice Reinvestment Approach to Improve Michigan's Sentencing System: Summary Report of Analyses and Policy Options
Corporate Author: Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
United States of America
Date Published: May 2014
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
New York, NY 10005
Pew Charitable Trust
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Grant Number: 2013-ZB-BX-K002
Sale Source: Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
100 Wall Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10005
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Summary)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents a summary of analyses and options for improving the State of Michigan’s sentencing system.
Abstract: This report, developed by the Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center at the request of Michigan’s legislators, presents a summary of analyses and options for improving the State’s sentencing system. The analysis included an examination of the whether the State’s sentencing guidelines achieved their intended goals of proportionality, consistency, and public safety. To determine whether the goals were achieved, the CSG Justice Center analyzed individual data records in 10 State databases that contained information on criminal arrest histories, felony sentencing, prison admissions and releases, probation and parole supervision, risk assessments and community corrections programming, and parole release decisions. Based on the information in these databases, the examination found that 1) there are opportunities to improve consistency and predictability in Michigan’s sentencing system; 2) key changes to the system could help reduce recidivism and costs to taxpayers; and 3) State and local officials need better tools to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the sentencing system. Policy options for implementing these changes are discussed. Figures
Main Term(s): Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): BJA Grant-related Documents; Michigan; Sentencing commissions; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing factors; Sentencing recommendations; Sentencing reform; Sentencing trends
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.