skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 246782     Find in a Library
Title: Applying a Justice Reinvestment Approach to Improve Michigan's Sentencing System: Summary Report of Analyses and Policy Options
  Document URL: PDF 
Corporate Author: Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
United States of America
Date Published: 05/2014
Page Count: 20
  Annotation: This report presents a summary of analyses and options for improving the State of Michigan’s sentencing system.
Abstract: This report, developed by the Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center at the request of Michigan’s legislators, presents a summary of analyses and options for improving the State’s sentencing system. The analysis included an examination of the whether the State’s sentencing guidelines achieved their intended goals of proportionality, consistency, and public safety. To determine whether the goals were achieved, the CSG Justice Center analyzed individual data records in 10 State databases that contained information on criminal arrest histories, felony sentencing, prison admissions and releases, probation and parole supervision, risk assessments and community corrections programming, and parole release decisions. Based on the information in these databases, the examination found that 1) there are opportunities to improve consistency and predictability in Michigan’s sentencing system; 2) key changes to the system could help reduce recidivism and costs to taxpayers; and 3) State and local officials need better tools to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the sentencing system. Policy options for implementing these changes are discussed. Figures
Main Term(s): Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): Sentencing disparity ; Sentencing commissions ; Sentencing reform ; Sentencing recommendations ; Sentencing factors ; Sentencing trends ; BJA grant-related documents ; Michigan
Sponsoring Agency: Pew Charitable Trust
United States of America

Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2013-ZB-BX-K002
Sale Source: Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
100 Wall Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10005
United States of America
Type: Report (Summary)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.