skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 247316     Find in a Library
  Title: Race and Prosecution in Manhattan - Research Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Besiki Kutateladze ; Whitney Tymas ; Mary Crowley
  Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
  Date Published: 07/2014
  Page Count: 10
  Annotation: The methodology and findings are presented from a study of how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion at key points in case processing can contribute to racially and ethnically disparate outcomes in New York County.
  Abstract: Factors most directly relevant to the legal aspects of a case - such as charge seriousness, prior record, and offense type - best predicted case outcomes; however, race remained a statistically significant independent factor in most of the prosecutorial discretion point examined in this study. The study found that the District Attorney’s Office of New York County (DANY) prosecutes nearly all cases brought by the police, with no noticeable racial or ethnic differences at case screening. For subsequent prosecutorial decisions, disparities varied by discretionary point and offense category. For all offenses combined, compared to similarly situated White defendants, Black and Latino defendants were more likely to be detained at arraignment, to receive a custodial sentence offer in plea bargaining, and to be incarcerated, but they were also more likely to have their cases dismissed; however, at arraignment, Blacks and Latinos charged with misdemeanor person offenses or misdemeanor drug offenses were more likely to be detained. Asian defendants had the most favorable outcomes across all prosecutorial discretionary points. The study concludes that conducting more thorough case screening and identifying cases that are likely to be dismissed at later stages of case processing may minimize unnecessary pretrial detention of such defendants. This should reduce the proportion of Blacks and Latinos who are given pretrial detention only to have their cases dismissed later. Race was not the strongest predictor of a custodial sentence. Other factors, such as prior record, offense type, defense counsel type, and charge seriousness were better predictors. Additional research is needed to explore factors related to plea bargain offers involving various types of offenses. 10 notes
  Main Term(s): Court procedures
  Index Term(s): Plea negotiations ; Prosecutorial discretion ; Pretrial release ; Prosecutorial screening ; Pretrial detention ; Race-crime relationships ; Race-punishment relationship ; NIJ grant-related documents ; New York ; Race
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2011-DJ-BX-0038
  Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America
  Type: Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored) ; Report (Summary)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=269416

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.