skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

JUSTINFO

Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 247316     Find in a Library
Title: Race and Prosecution in Manhattan - Research Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Besiki Kutateladze ; Whitney Tymas ; Mary Crowley
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 07/2014
Page Count: 10
  Annotation: The methodology and findings are presented from a study of how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion at key points in case processing can contribute to racially and ethnically disparate outcomes in New York County.
Abstract: Factors most directly relevant to the legal aspects of a case - such as charge seriousness, prior record, and offense type - best predicted case outcomes; however, race remained a statistically significant independent factor in most of the prosecutorial discretion point examined in this study. The study found that the District Attorney’s Office of New York County (DANY) prosecutes nearly all cases brought by the police, with no noticeable racial or ethnic differences at case screening. For subsequent prosecutorial decisions, disparities varied by discretionary point and offense category. For all offenses combined, compared to similarly situated White defendants, Black and Latino defendants were more likely to be detained at arraignment, to receive a custodial sentence offer in plea bargaining, and to be incarcerated, but they were also more likely to have their cases dismissed; however, at arraignment, Blacks and Latinos charged with misdemeanor person offenses or misdemeanor drug offenses were more likely to be detained. Asian defendants had the most favorable outcomes across all prosecutorial discretionary points. The study concludes that conducting more thorough case screening and identifying cases that are likely to be dismissed at later stages of case processing may minimize unnecessary pretrial detention of such defendants. This should reduce the proportion of Blacks and Latinos who are given pretrial detention only to have their cases dismissed later. Race was not the strongest predictor of a custodial sentence. Other factors, such as prior record, offense type, defense counsel type, and charge seriousness were better predictors. Additional research is needed to explore factors related to plea bargain offers involving various types of offenses. 10 notes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Plea negotiations ; Prosecutorial discretion ; Pretrial release ; Prosecutorial screening ; Pretrial detention ; Race-crime relationships ; Race-punishment relationship ; NIJ grant-related documents ; New York ; Race
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2011-DJ-BX-0038
Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored) ; Report (Summary)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=269416

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.