skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 247881 Find in a Library
Title: Addressing the Impact of Wrongful Convictions on Crime Victims
Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:274  Dated:2014  Pages:34-38
Series: NIJ Journal
Author(s): Seri Irazola; Erin Williamson; Julie Stricker; Emily Niedzwiecki
Date Published: 2014
Page Count: 5
Grant Number: GS-23F-8182H
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Instructional Material; Issue Overview
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined how wrongful convictions affected the original victims in 11 of such cases, and recommendations for improving services to such victims are offered.
Abstract: More than half of the victims described the impact of the wrongful conviction as being comparable to, or worse than, that of the original victimization. Many reported they were in shock when they first heard about the exoneration. The majority of the victims also reported having intense feelings of guilt, especially among the two-thirds of victims who provided eyewitness identification. In addition, victims felt they were targets of anger in various media, and some feared that the wrongfully convicted person might retaliate against them and their families. When asked for recommendations on how to better serve these victims, both victims and stakeholders recommended improving notification information and services for crime victims involved in cases of wrongful convictions. There was agreement that the criminal justice system should provide initial notification, preferably through the officials involved in the original cases. Many stakeholders proposed having a victim service provider present when the notification is given in person. Others emphasized having a law enforcement representative or prosecutor present to provide information about possible additional litigation, including plans to continue the investigation to find the perpetrator or prosecute a suspect already arrested. Recommendations varied regarding the timing of victim notification of the wrongful conviction. 4 recommendations for additional information on this issue
Main Term(s): Victim services
Index Term(s): Psychological victimization effects; Victim Services Notification; Wrongful conviction
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.