skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 248533 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Under the Radar or Under Arrest: How Does Contact with the Juvenile Justice System Affect Delinquency and Academic Outcomes?
Author(s): Jordan B. Beardslee
Date Published: 2014
Page Count: 201
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0020; SES-1154827
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research)
Format: Dissertation/Thesis; Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study re-examines prior research results that found arrested youth are more likely than non-arrested youth to experience maladjustment later in life, and corrects for methodological limitations restricting the generalizations of prior research.
Abstract: Studies have found that arrested youth are more likely than non-arrested youth to experience later maladjustment; however, methodological limitations restrict these generalizations. The most noteworthy limitation of prior research are potential “selection effects,” with arrested youth likely to have different psychological and behavioral profiles prior to justice system contact than non-arrested youth. This presents the question of whether the observed maladjustment is due to the type of adolescent who comes in contact with law enforcement or due the type of intervention that the arrested youth experiences. The authors overcome these limitations by comparing the outcomes of demographically similar adolescents who commit the same crime, but differ in regard to outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare arrested and non-arrested youth, and the author investigated whether contact with the justice system contributed to school-related outcomes, substance use, and delinquency, and if these varied based on arrest, formal processing, or diversion. Selection effects were taken into consideration and indicate that contact with the juvenile justice system does not have a universally harmful effect on development. Diversion was found to deter future offending and school misconduct. However, both diverted and processed youth were more likely to be arrested during the study period with the risk of re-arrest highest for processed youth. Formally processed youth were also more likely to be transferred to an alternative or continuation school. The results suggest that increased justice system surveillance might improve school performance and deter offending, but may also lead to further contact. Although an adolescent’s first arrest might lead to positive outcomes in the immediate future, the effects of subsequent contacts are unknown. The data suggest that the default policy should be to divert low-level, first-time offenders and keep justice system contact to a minimum.
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency research
Index Term(s): Juvenile arrest statistics; Juvenile arrest trends; Juvenile delinquency factors; Juvenile delinquency prediction; Juvenile delinquency theory; Juvenile recidivism prediction; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report
Note: This project was supported by Grant No. 2012-IJ-CX-0020 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice and Award No. SES-1154827 awarded by the National Science Foundation. Findings and conclusions of the research reported here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice or the National Science Foundation.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.