PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

	NCJ Number:		NCJ 249006
	Title:		Reduction of False Convictions Through Improved Identification Procedures: Further Refinements for Street Practice and Public Policy
	URL(s):		PDF
	Dataset URL:		DATASET 1
	Author(s):		Nancy K. Steblay
	Date Published:		07/2015
	Page Count:		92
	Annotation:		The overall objective of this study was to improve the quality and probative value of evidence obtained from eyewitnesses through police lineup procedures.
	Abstract:		A sequential lineup of individuals was found to produce more accurate eyewitness suspect identifications from lineups than a simultaneous lineup of a group of individuals. In addition, new laboratory data obtained in this study found an improvement in eyewitness identification accuracy by giving eyewitnesses the option for a “not-sure“ response option. Giving eyewitnesses the instruction that a suspect’s appearance may have been changed had minimal impact on the accuracy of suspect identifications. A significant negative outcome resulted from exposing eyewitnesses to repeated lineups. The study conducted an updated meta-analytic review of research that compared simultaneous to sequential lineup formats. An evaluation was conducted of the sequential superiority effects, and factors that moderate this effect are explained. Controlled laboratory testing was conducted of the impact on eyewitness accuracy of three individual lineup procedural components: relaxation fo the “Yes/No” response requirement of the sequential lineup procedure to allow for “I’m not sure” responses, an appearance-change instruction to eyewitnesses, and the use of multiple identification tasks with the same witness. The study also collected and analyzed data in collaboration with the Tucson Police Department (Arizona) in comparing performance on lineup identification under double-blind simultaneous versus double-blind sequential line-up procedures. 7 tables and 59 references
	Main Term(s):		Police policies and procedures
	Index Term(s):		Suspect identification ; Line-up ; Investigative techniques ; Eyewitness memory ; NIJ final report ; Eyewitnesses ; NIJ Resources
	Sponsoring Agency:		National Institute of Justice (NIJ) US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs United States of America
	Grant Number:		2007-IJ-CX-0046
	Sale Source:		US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub 810 Seventh Street, NW Washington, DC 20531 United States of America
	Type:		Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
	Country:		United States of America
	Language:		English
	To cite this abstract, use the following link: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=271146
*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.