skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250538 Find in a Library
Title: Applied Research, Development, and Method Validation for a Statistically Based Comparison of Tool Marks Using GelSight-Based Three Dimensional Imaging and Novel Comparison Algorithms for Firearm Forensics
Author(s): Ryan Lilien
Date Published: January 2017
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2014-DN-BX-K012
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The reported project is a critical next step in investigating the overall performance characteristics of a novel, accurate, and low-cost system (TopMatch) for structural 3D imaging and comparison of cartridge casings.
Abstract: TopMatch technology shows excellent and continually improving match accuracy; however, in order to fully establish the base credibility of the platform, it was necessary to establish best-scamming practices and to demonstrate that the method meets the quality-control criteria of other forensic instruments. The current project aimed to enhance TopMatch by establishing best practices and conducting a set of methodology studies. The project followed the intent of the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods’ Validation Guidelines for Analysis Methods document. That document describes seven validation criteria for new scientific methods: Accuracy, Stability, Precision, Repeatability, Reproducibility, Contamination Risk, and Performance Checks. The current project complements the previous studies on “Accuracy” and evidence “Stability” by addressing the remaining issues of Precision, Repeatability, Reproducibility, Contamination Risk, and Performance Checks. In addition, researchers will study the effects of Cleaning Protocols, Focus Variation, and Ambient Lighting Variation. 8 tables, 6 figures, and 3 references
Main Term(s): Forensic sciences
Index Term(s): Ballistics; Comparative analysis; Equipment and technology; Investigative techniques; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Probabilistic evidence; Statistical Accuracy; Statistical analysis; Toolmark identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.