skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250802 Find in a Library
Title: Understanding Ethnic Disparities in Juvenile Probation: What Affects Decisions?
Author(s): Rudy Haapanen
Date Published: June 2016
Page Count: 93
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2014-JF-FX-0105
Sale Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study used information on probation actions for cohorts of youth in two major mid-state California counties in conducing an empirical overview of how cases in the juvenile justice system are handled at various decision points for various types of referrals and for different ethnic groups (White, Black, Latino, and “other”).
Abstract: The decisionmaking process that led to ethnic disparities was then described for each decision point, using documented policies and descriptions obtained from interviews with probation staff and administrators. The analysis focused on limitations and constraints on decisionmaking that resulted from laws/policies and resource availability. Analyses addressed decisionmaking patterns for individual youth within each county, with consideration of each youth’s prior record of involvement with the juvenile justice system. The objective was to develop an empirical description of decisions for youth with various combinations of prior referrals and current offense severity. Disparities, if found, would receive additional qualitative exploratory research to aid in understanding these disparities in the context of constraints and limitations of decisions. After examining several years of probation referrals and thousands of cases, the analysis found little evidence of consistent, systematic disparity in how juveniles were handled by probation and the juvenile courts in either of the two counties. Both counties have focused on addressing ethnic bias in juvenile justice. These efforts have apparently been effective in rendering fair and equal treatment across ethnic groups. Consistent with earlier studies, probation decisions in the current study were found to rely heavily on offense histories and other legal factors, especially after the first referral. Graduated interventions - such as referral of the case to the district attorney, informal court probation, or formal wardship - seem more prudent as the number of referrals increases; this was found in the current study. 20 tables, 29 references, and appended management information systems descriptions
Main Term(s): Juvenile Corrections/Detention Decisionmaking
Index Term(s): California; Discretionary decisions; Disproportionate Minority Confinement; Juvenile justice policies; Juvenile probation; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP); OJJDP final report; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.